Purpose
Review project progress
Identify barriers and create plans to support the project
Ensure teams are adhering to the standard process
Keep projects on track to achieve sustainable improvement
Attendees
Required: QI Coach and/or Team Leader
Invited, but not required: Project Sponsor and Physician Leader
What to Expect
Session are held via Zoom
Sessions are one hour long
Sessions are moderated by the Collaborative Physician Leader and Learning Network QI experts.
Teams will use the A3 to present their projects to moderators and collaborative cohort peers.
Teams present one by one (5 minutes to present and 5 minutes for feedback)
Project progress is scored on a 5 point scale. This scale helps us understand where the project is in relation to where we think it should be.
Agenda items for the week will be determined by where you are in your project.
Seek first to understand, then to be understood
Your Role as a Presenter
Deliver the information clearly and concisely.
Utilize visuals (quality improvement templates) to tell your story.
Bring people up to speed on your project. Focus your presentation on the progress made since the last session, plans for the upcoming week, and any potential barriers you may encounter.
Your Role as an Audience Member
Do not solve the presenters problem or redirect the project.
Ask the presenter questions that will help them, not you
Share experiences and insight as appropriate within the program methodology
Project Progress Scale
The project progress scale helps leadership understand where the project is in relation to where it should be in the program. Each session, your project will receive a project progress score from the moderators. By the end of the program, your project should score between 3.0 and 4.0.
Score | Criteria |
---|---|
5.0 | Sustained, world- or national- leading performance |
4.5 | Sustained results at goal with sustain plan in place |
4.0 | Measures meeting goal with data meeting SPC criteria |
3.5 | Data meeting SPC criteria for improvement, not yet at goal |
3.0 | Initial test cycles begun with evidence of modest improvement |
2.5 | Changes tested, but no measurable improvement |
2.0 | Key drivers and possible interventions identified |
1.5 | Current state assessed with process maps and analysis |
1.0 | Team formed, problem statement and SMART goal articulated |
0.5 | Team formed, problem and background articulated |
0.0 | Project identified but no project progress made |